Berbagai Instrumen Penilaian Photoaging dan Karakteristiknya

Authors

  • Putu Martha Gerynda Sukma Departemen Dermatologi dan Venereologi, Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia/RSUPN Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Shannaz Nadia Yusharyahya Departemen Dermatologi dan Venereologi, Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia/RSUPN Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Sri Linuwih SW Menaldi Departemen Dermatologi dan Venereologi, Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia/RSUPN Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Lili Legiawati Departemen Dermatologi dan Venereologi, Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia/RSUPN Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Rinadewi Astriningrum Departemen Dermatologi dan Venereologi, Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia/RSUPN Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36452/jkdoktmeditek.v29i1.2454

Keywords:

dermoskopi, instrumen penilaian, penuaan kulit, photoaging

Abstract

Seiring dengan bertambahnya usia seseorang, kulit sebagai jaringan terluar dari tubuh manusia akan memberikan gambaran paling terlihat dari proses penuaan. Penuaan kulit dipengaruhi oleh dua faktor yaitu faktor intrinsik dan faktor ekstrinsik. Faktor intrinsik terjadi secara alamiah dan berkaitan dengan proses degenerasi seluler. Faktor ekstrinsik berkaitan dengan pajanan sinar matahari, rokok, dan polusi udara. Penyebab utama penuaan kulit akibat faktor ekstrinsik berupa pajanan kronik sinar ultraviolet dikenal sebagai photoaging. Tanda klinis photoaging dapat bervariasi, namun yang sering ditemukan berupa perubahan pigmentasi dan keriput. Saat ini telah tersedia lebih dari 100 instrumen penilaian penuaan kulit menggunakan fotografi, dermoskopi, dan alat diagnostik multifungsi namun masih belum ada yang dianggap sebagai baku emas. Tinjauan pustaka ini bertujuan untuk membahas berbagai instrumen penilaian photoaging yang sering digunakan dalam praktik klinis sehari-hari dan karakteristik dari masing-masing instrumen tersebut.

References

Addor FAS. Beyond photoaging: additional factors involved in the process of skin aging. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2018;11:437-43.

Hu SC, Lin CL, Yu HS. Dermoscopic assessment of xerosis severity, pigmentation pattern and vascular morphology in subjects with physiological aging and photoaging. Eur J Dermatol. 2019;29:274-80.

Kerns ML, Chien AL, Kang S. Skin aging. Dalam: Kang S, Amagai M, Bruckner AL, Enk AH, Margolis DJ, McMichael AJ, et al., editor. Fitzpatrick’s Dermatology. Edisi ke-9. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2019.h.1779-91.

Respati RA. Profil photoaging berdasarkan dermoscopy photoaging scale pada populasi daerah pesisir dan berbagai faktor yang berhubungan. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia; 2021.

Magdy R, Sadek A. Dermoscopic findings of photo-ageing in Egyptian patients. Egypt Dermatol Online J. 2015;11.

Isik B, Gurel MS, Erdemir AT, Kesmezacar O. Development of skin aging scale by using dermoscopy. Skin Res Technol. 2013;19:69-74.

Yu SH, Baron ED. Evaluation and assessment of photoaging. Photo Lasers Med. 2013;2:305-14.

Durai PC, Thappa DM, Kumari R, Malathi M. Aging in elderly: chronological versus photoaging. Indian J Dermatol. 2012;57:343-52.

Glogau RG. Aesthetic and anatomic analysis of the aging skin. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 1996;15:134-8.

Cabrera-Ramírez JO, Puebla-Mora AG, González-Ojeda A, García-Martínez D, Cortés-Lares JA, Márquez-Valdés AR, et al. Platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of photodamage of the skin of the hands. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2017;108:746-51.

Nabila Y, Damayanti D, Handayani S, Setyaningrum T. The effect of lifestyle on skin aging. Berkala Ilmu Kesehatan Kulit dan Kelamin. 2021;33:110.

Sparavigna A, Tenconi B, Giori AM, Bellia G, La Penna L. Evaluation of the efficacy of a new hyaluronic acid gel on dynamic and static wrinkles in volunteers with moderate aging/photoaging. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2019;12:81-90.

El-Sayed MH, Saleh HM, El Zawahry KMA, Mostafa AE. The dermoscopic features of facial aging among Egyptians: a comparative study between males and females. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2019;18:1803-13.

Sonthalia S, Errichetti E. Dermoscopy - not just for diagnosis and not just for dermatologists. Kathmandu Univ Med J. 2017;15:1-2.

Muslim M, Jusuf NK, Putra IB. The dermoscopic features of facial aging among diverse ethnicity in Medan, Indonesia. Bali Med J. 2021;10:6.

Ayer J, Ahmed A, Duncan-Parry E, Beck P, Griffiths TW, Watson REB, et al. A photonumeric scale for the assessment of atrophic facial photodamage. Br J Dermatol. 2018;178:e369.

Larnier C, Ortonne JP, Venot A, Faivre B, Béani JC, Thomas P, et al. Evaluation of cutaneous photodamage using a photographic scale. Br J Dermatol. 1994;130:167-73.

Lemperle G, Holmes RE, Cohen SR, Lemperle SM. A classification of facial wrinkles. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:1735-50.

Shoshani D, Markovitz E, Monstrey SJ, Narins DJ. The modified Fitzpatrick Wrinkle Scale: a clinical validated measurement tool for nasolabial wrinkle severity assessment. Dermatol Surg. 2008;34:85-91.

Jiang Y, Zhang X, Lu Z, Gold MH. Assessment of efficacy and safety of a fractionated bipolar radiofrequency device for the treatment of lower face wrinkles and laxity. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2018;20:205-10.

Ebrahim HM, Gharib K. Correction of nasolabial folds wrinkle using intraoral non-ablative Er:YAG laser. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2018;20:364-8.

Bazin R, Flament F. Skin aging atlas Volume 2: Asian Type. Edisi. Paris: Med’com Publishing; 2010.

Flament F, Abric A, Amar D. Gender-related differences in the facial aging of Chinese subjects and their relations with perceived ages. Skin Res Technol. 2020;26:905-13.

Yusharyahya SN, Bramono K, Indriatmi W, Prasetyo M, Ascobat P, Hestiantoro A, et al. Anti-aging effects of fenugreek cream on postmenopausal skin: a randomized controlled trial. J App Pharm Sci. 2021;11:95-103.

Huang AH, Chien AL. Photoaging: a review of current literature. Curr Dermatol Rep. 2020;9:22-9.

Chung JH. Photoaging in Asians. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2003;19:109-21.

Goldsberry A, Hanke CW, Hanke KE. VISIA system: a possible tool in the cosmetic practice. J Drugs Dermatol. 2014;13:1312-4.

Wang X, Shu X, Li Z, Huo W, Zou L, Tang Y, et al. Comparison of two kinds of skin imaging analysis software: VISIA(®) from Canfield and IPP(®) from Media Cybernetics. Skin Res Technol. 2018;24:379-85.

Linming F, Wei H, Anqi L, Yuanyu C, Heng X, Sushmita P, et al. Comparison of two skin imaging analysis instruments: The VISIA(®) from Canfield vs the ANTERA 3D(®) CS from Miravex. Skin Res Technol. 2018;24:3-8.

Leem S, Chang J, Kim Y, Shin JG, Song HJ, Lee SG, et al. Repeated measurements of facial skin characteristics using the Janus-Ⅲ measurement system. Skin Res Technol. 2020;26:362-8.

Published

2023-01-14

How to Cite

Sukma, P. M. G. ., Yusharyahya, S. N. ., Menaldi, S. L. S., Legiawati, L. ., & Astriningrum, R. (2023). Berbagai Instrumen Penilaian Photoaging dan Karakteristiknya. Jurnal Kedokteran Meditek, 29(1), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.36452/jkdoktmeditek.v29i1.2454

Issue

Section

Tinjauan Pustaka