Keberhasilan Penerapan Blended Learning pada Pendidikan Profesi Dokter di Masa Pandemi COVID-19

Eva Oktavia; Asriana Timang; Citra Rencana Peranginangin

doi:10.36452/jkdoktmeditek.v29i2.2546

Authors

Eva Oktavia Departemen anestesi, Fakultas Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan, Universitas Kristen Krida Wacana, Jakarta, Indonesia
Asriana Timang Fakultas Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan, Universitas Kristen Krida Wacana, Jakarta, Indonesia
Citra Rencana Peranginangin Departemen anestesi, Fakultas Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan, Universitas Kristen Krida Wacana, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36452/jkdoktmeditek.v29i2.2546

Keywords:

blended learning, mahasiswa kedokteran, magang klinis, pendidikan kedokteran, rotasi klinik

Abstract

Pendidikan profesi dokter merupakan tahap lanjutan setelah pendidikan sarjana kedokteran dengan mayoritas pembelajaran dilakukan dalam bentuk praktik magang klinis di institusi kesehatan. Blended learning dalam pendidikan rotasi klinik belum banyak dilakukan di Asia termasuk Indonesia. Pandemi COVID-19 pada akhirnya mendorong diwajibkannya metode pembelajaran tersebut pada semua lini pendidikan, termasuk profesi dokter. Tujuan tinjauan pustaka ini adalah memberikan gambaran keberhasilan blended learning pada pendidikan profesi dokter serta rekomendasi teknis dalam penerapannya. Metode pencarian literatur yaitu dengan mencari publikasi jurnal pada tahun 2020-2021 dari PubMed dan ProQuest dalam bahasa Inggris dan Indonesia. Hasil pencarian didapatkan 9 (sembilan) jurnal penelitian yang memenuhi kriteria inklusi dan melaporkan tingkat kepuasan yang baik dari mahasiswa maupun pendidik klinik. Metode yang digunakan juga dilaporkan meningkatkan kemandirian belajar mahasiswa. Mayoritas studi tidak menunjukan perbedaan yang bermakna dalam pencapaian prestasi mahasiswa baik sebelum maupun setelah penerapan blended learning. Dari tinjauan pustaka ini dapat disimpulkan bahwa rotasi klinik blended learning dapat diterima dengan baik oleh mahasiswa dan pendidik klinis karena mampu memberikan fleksibilitas pengajaran dan meningkatkan kemandirian belajar mahasiswa.

References

Richard Arends. Learning to teach. 9th ed. McGraw Hill; 2014. 7-11p

Tien M, Aiudi CM, Sviggum HP, Long TR. A peer-designed selective in anesthesiology, critical care, and perioperative medicine for first- and second-year medical students. J Clin Anesth [Internet]. 2016;31:175–81. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.02.006.

Williams JK. The handbook of blended learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs. Acad Manag Learn Educ [Internet]. 2008;7(1):132. Available from: https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/handbook-blended-learning-global-perspectives/docview/223298488/se-2?accountid=50673.

Zhao J, McConnell D, Jiang Y. Teachers’ conceptions of e-learning in chinese higher education: A phenomenographic analysis. Campus-Wide Inf Syst. 2009;26(2):90–7.

Latchem C, Jung I, Aoki K, Ozkul AE. The tortoise and the hare enigma in e-transformation in Japanese and Korean higher education. Br J Educ Technol [Internet]. 2008;39(4):610–30. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00771.x

Chatti MA, Jarke M, Frosch-Wilke D. The future of e-learning: a shift to knowledge networking and social software. Int J Knowl Learn. 2007;3(4–5):404–20.

Wenzel V, Gravenstein N. Anesthesiology mentoring. Curr Opin Anesthesiol [Internet]. 2016;29(6). Available from: https://journals.lww.com/co-anesthesiology/Fulltext/2016/12000/Anesthesiology_mentoring.11.aspx

Menaldi SL, Nilasari H, Rahmayunita G, Farida S, Prasetya NL. Blended learning as a method for improving students’ achievement in dermatotherapy: a preliminary study. J Pendidik Kedokt Indones Indones J Med Educ. 2020;9(3):249.

KKI. Standar Pendidikan Profesi Dokter Indonesia. Kons Kedokt Indones. 2019;169.

Menteri pendidikan dan kebudayaan, menteri agama, menteri kesehatan meteri dalam negeri. Keputusan bersama menteri pendidikan dan kebudayaan, menteri agama, menteri kesehatan, dan menteri dalam negeri Republik Indonesia. 2020.

Teichgräber U, Ingwersen M, Bürckenmeyer F, Malouhi A, Arndt C, Herzog A, et al. Structured work-based learning in undergraduate clinical radiology immersion experience. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21(1):1–10.

Vavasseur A, Muscari F, Meyrignac O, Nodot M, Dedouit F, Revel-Mouroz P, et al. Blended learning of radiology improves medical students’ performance, satisfaction, and engagement. Insights Imaging. 2020;11(1).

Patiwael JA, Douma AH, Bezakova N, Kusurkar RA, Daelmans HEM. Collaborative testing in physical examination skills training and the autonomous motivation of students: a qualitative study. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21(1):1–10.

Pinilla S, Cantisani A, Klöppel S, Strik W, Nissen C, Huwendiek S. Curriculum development with the implementation of an open-source learning management system for training early clinical students: An educational design research study. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2021;12:53–61.

Otaki F, Zaher S, Plessis S Du, Lakhtakia R, Zary N, Inuwa IM. Introducing the 4Ps model of transitioning to distance learning: A convergent mixed methods study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS One [Internet]. 2021;:1–20. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253662

Alamer A, Alharbi F. Synchronous distance teaching of radiology clerkship promotes medical students’ learning and engagement. Insights Imaging [Internet]. 2021;12(1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-021-00984-w

Kurz S, Lohse J, Buggenhagen H, Schmidtmann I, Laufenberg-Feldmann R, Engelhard K. Improving competence and safety in pain medicine: a practical clinical teaching strategy for students combining simulation and bedside teaching. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21(1):1–7.

Guadalajara H, Palazón Á, Lopez-Fernandez O, Esteban-Flores P, Garcia JM, Gutiérrez-Misis A, et al. Towards an open medical school without checkerboards during the COVID-19 pandemic: How to flexibly self-manage general surgery practices in hospitals? Healthc. 2021;9(6).

Kim JW, Myung SJ, Yoon HB, Moon SH, Ryu H, Yim JJ. How medical education survives and evolves during COVID-19: Our experience and future direction. PLoS One [Internet]. 2020;15(12 December):1–12. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243958

Maryeni Y. Aplikasi e-Learning sebagai model pembelajaran berbasis teknologi informasi. J Vokasi. 2013;9(1):27–39.

Fandianta, Sanjaya GY, Widyandana. Meningkatkan pengetahuan mahasiswa dengan memberikan fleksibilitas belajar melalui metode blended learning. J Pendidik Kedokt Indones. 2013;2(2):1–8.

Rohan D, Ahern S, Walsh K. Defining an anaesthetic curriculum for medical undergraduates. A delphi study. Med Teach. 2009;31(1).

Allen IE, Seaman J, Garrett R. Blending in: The extent and promise of blended education in the United States. Sloan Consort [Internet]. 2007;1–29. Available from: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED529930.pdf

Ali Alammary, Judy Sheard AC. Blended learning in higher education: Three different design approaches. Australas J Educ Technol. 2014;30(4):440–54.

John Watson E. Blended learning: the convergence of online and face-to-face education. North American Council for Online Learning; 2008. 1–17 p.