Gambaran Tingkat Pemahaman Anatomi Klinis pada Dokter Spesialis Kedokteran Fisik dan Rehabilitasi di Jakarta

Authors

  • Nelson Sudiyono Fakultas Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Hans Liemanto Fakultas Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Herlina Uinarni Fakultas Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Tena Djuartina Fakultas Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Robi Irawan Fakultas Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Poppy Kristina Sasmita Fakultas Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36452/jkdoktmeditek.v32i4.4095

Keywords:

anatomy, learning methods, physical medicine and rehabilitation

Abstract

Introduction: Anatomical knowledge is a fundamental foundation in the practice of physical medicine and rehabilitation specialists (physiatrists), particularly in diagnosis and medical management. Studies have shown that understanding of anatomy may decline over time, potentially affecting diagnostic accuracy and the success of medical interventions. This has encouraged researchers to investigate the understanding of clinical anatomy in PM&R specialists practice in Jakarta. Purpose: To describe the level of understanding, perception, and application of clinical anatomy in daily PM&R specialists’ practice. Methods: This study was a descriptive study. The respondents were PM&R specialists in Jakarta, with a total sample of 40 participants. Data were collected through electronic questionnaires completed by respondents who met the inclusion criteria. Results: Data collection included an anatomy quiz, with a mean score of 70.9. A total of 52.5% of respondents scored above the mean. The most commonly used anatomy learning methods were clinical-based (50%) and integrative (57.5%). Anatomical knowledge, particularly in physical examination, was applied by 90% of respondents in daily practice. Conclusion: A proportion of respondents demonstrated an adequate level of anatomical knowledge, as they consistently integrate anatomical understanding into daily clinical practice. However, there remains room for improvement through continuing professional development related to clinical anatomy.

References

1. Ismawanto LY. Media pembelajaran anatomi tubuh manusia berbasis android. JATI. 2017;1(2):55-60. https://doi.org/10.36040/jati.v1i2.2098

2. Esquenazi A, Frontera W. The Organizations of physical and rehabilitation medicine in the world. J Int Soc Phys Rehabil Med. 2019;2(4):139-142.

3. Nugraha ZS, Khadafianto F, Fidianingsih I. Refleksi pembelajaran anatomi pada mahasiswa kedokteran fase ketiga melalui applied and clinical question. Refleksi pembelajaran inovatif. 2019 Jan 12;1(1):21–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/rpi.vol1.iss1.art3

4. Doomernik DE, van Goor H, Kooloos JGM, ten Broek RP. Longitudinal retention of anatomical knowledge in second‐year medical students. Anat Sci Educ. 2017 Jun 5;10(3):242–8. DOI: 10.1002/ase.1656

5. Koppes DM, Triepels CPR, Notten KJB, Smeets CFA, Kruitwagen RFPM, Van Gorp T, et al. The Level of anatomical knowledge, hard to establish: a systematic narrative review. Med Sci Educ. 2022; 32:569–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-022-01509-w

6. Mahda A, Arfiyanti MP, Novitasari A. Analisis deskriptif kualitas soal multiple choice questions (MCQ) mini kuis tutorial di Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang. J Kedokt Kes. 2023; 10:2177-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33024/jikk.v10i6.9932

7. Albert FA, Seidu AA, Mason HM, Anderson E, Alele FO, Heggarty P, Hollins A, Gupta TS, Hays RB, McArthur L, Malau-Aduli BS. A Systematic review of medical practitioners' retention and application of basic sciences to clinical practice. BMC Med Educ. 2024 Sep 13;24(1):997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05952-8.

8. Saeed M, Ahmed L, AbdAlla E, Alatawi Z, Alhowiti AM, Elmahdi TSA, et al. Retention of gross and clinical anatomy knowledge among medical graduates in Sudan: a comparative study. BMC Med Educ. 2025 Dec 1;25(1):227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06832-5

9. Samuels MA, Feske SM. Office practice of neurology. Elsevier; 2003.

10. Kim JS, Kim HG, Chung CS. Medial medullary syndrome: Report of 18 New Patients and a Review of The Literature. Stroke. 1995 Sep;26(9):1548–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.26.9.1548

11. Dewi SP, Siswishanto R, Dasuki D. Pengaruh pelatihan ultrasonografi terhadap tingkat pengetahuan residen obstetri dan ginekologi mengenai keamanan penggunaan ultrasonografi obstetri. Jurnal Kesehatan Reproduksi. 2019;6(1):23–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.22146/jkr.42373

12. Maruvada S, Madrazo-Ibarra A, Varacallo MA. Anatomy, rotator cuff. [Updated 2023 Mar 27]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-. Diunduh dari: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK441844/

13. Nardi NM, Schaefer TJ. Nursemaid elbow. [Updated 2023 Aug 14]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan. Diunduh dari: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK430777/

14. Costa TG, Campos MH, Barros ACF, Andrade MS, Vancini RL, Viana RB, Rosemann T, Weiss K, Knechtle B, de Lira CAB. The segmental-based approach during anatomy coursework presents better results than the systems-based approach. BMC Med Educ. 2024 Dec 25;24(1):1529. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06541-5

15. Wiyono N, Hastami Y. Alternatif metode pembelajaran anatomi kedokteran. Anatomica Medical Journal Fakultas Kedokteran. 2018:68-77. https://doi.org/10.30596/anatomica

16. Yuliana. The Possible innovation in teaching and learning anatomy. Journal of Smart System. 2024;3(2):20-25.

17. Jusuf, A. A. Metode pengajaran anatomi. Dalam Buku standar kurikulum anatomi. Perhimpunan Ahli Anatomi Indonesia (PAAI). 2019. p.8.

18. Santoso B, Rochman F, Marlini A, Nuhonni SA, Soebadi RD, Wirawan RP, et al. White Book Kedokteran Fisik dan Rehabilitasi. Wahyuni LK, Tulaar ABM, editors. Vol. 2. Jakarta: PB PERDOSRI; 2019.

19. Matveeva N, Zhivadinovikj Bogdanovska J, Zafirova B, Chadikovska E, Dodevski A, Trpkovska B, et al. Anatomy education and clinical practice: students’ views. Folia Morphol 2025;84(3):690-701. https://doi.org/10.5603/fm.102829

20. Arráez-Aybar LA, Sánchez-Montesinos I, Mirapeix RM, Mompeo-Corredera B, Sañudo-Tejero JR. Relevance of human anatomy in daily clinical practice. Annals of Anatomy - Anatomischer Anzeiger. 2010 Dec;192(6):341–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2010.05.002

Published

2026-07-24

How to Cite

Sudiyono, N., Liemanto, H., Uinarni, H., Djuartina, T., Irawan, R., & Sasmita, P. K. (2026). Gambaran Tingkat Pemahaman Anatomi Klinis pada Dokter Spesialis Kedokteran Fisik dan Rehabilitasi di Jakarta. Jurnal Kedokteran Meditek, 32(4), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.36452/jkdoktmeditek.v32i4.4095

Issue

Section

Research Article