Fabrikasi dan Karakterisasi Membran Selulosa Bakteri-Kolagen dengan Metode Freeze Drying sebagai Kandidat Dural Graft
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36452/jkdoktmeditek.v32i4.4336Keywords:
Bacterial cellulose, biocomposites, collagen, dural graftAbstract
Introduction: The dura mater protects the brain, maintains tissue stability, and prevents cerebrospinal fluid leakage. Dural defects from trauma, tumors, or neurosurgery often require duraplasty using a dural graft. Current materials—autologous, allogeneic, and synthetic—have limitations including infection risk, adhesion, immune reactions, and limited availability, prompting exploration of alternative materials. Bacterial cellulose offers high biocompatibility and a nanofibrillar structure resembling the extracellular matrix, while collagen enhances material bioactivity. Objective: This study evaluated bacterial cellulose-collagen biocomposites as candidate dural implants using FTIR and swelling tests. Methods: Bacterial cellulose was synthesized using Acetobacter xylinum in coconut water medium and freeze-dried for 48 hours. Biocomposites were prepared by immersing cellulose pellicles in collagen solutions at 0% (control), 0.5%, 1%, and 1.5% (w/v), dried at room temperature, and characterized by FTIR and swelling analysis. Results: Collagen incorporation altered the chemical structure, shown by increased O–H groups and a wavenumber shift with eventual disappearance of the C–H group as collagen concentration rose. Swelling ratio increased across all collagen-containing samples, indicating interactions that may modify the material's physical properties. Conclusion: Collagen addition improved the structural and swelling characteristics of the biocomposites, supporting their potential as artificial dura mater material, pending further evaluation of mechanical properties and biocompatibility.
References
1. Khairani Y, Makmur T. Hubungan antara cedera kepala dan terjadinya vertigo di RSUD Dr Pirngadi Medan periode Januari-Desember 2019. J Kedokt Ibnu Nafis [Internet]. 2021 Jun 1 [cited 2026 Jun 30];10(1):26–32. Available from: https://doi.org/10.30743/jkin.v10i1.140
2. Ichwanuddin I, Nashirah A. Cedera kepala sedang. Averrous: J Kedokt Kes Malikussaleh [Internet]. 2022 Nov 30 [cited 2026 Jun 30];8(2):1–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.29103/averrous.v8i2.8726
3. Keller JT, Ongkiko CM, Saunders MC, Mayfield FH, Dunsker SB. Repair of spinal dural defects. J Neurosurg [Internet]. 1984 May [cited 2026 May 8];60(5):1022–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1984.60.5.1022
4. Liu JM, Chen XY, Zhou Y, Long XH, Chen WZ, Liu ZL, et al. Is nonstructural bone graft useful in surgical treatment of lumbar spinal tuberculosis? Medicine [Internet]. 2016 Aug [cited 2026 May 8];95(35):e4677. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004677
5. Wang B, Shi W, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Yang C, Huang T, et al. Duraplasty with autologous nuchal ligament fascia to reduce postoperative complications in pediatric patients undergoing neoplasia resection with a suboccipital midline approach. J Neurosurg Pediatr [Internet]. 2022 Nov 1 [cited 2026 May 8];30(5):538–46. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3171/2022.7.PEDS2265
6. Thadani V, Penar PL, Partington J, Kalb R, Janssen R, Schonberger LB, et al. Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease probably acquired from a cadaveric dura mater graft. J Neurosurg [Internet]. 1988 Nov [cited 2026 May 8];69(5):766–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1988.69.5.0766
7. Xu T, Yuan Y. Artificial dura mater and manufacturing method thereof [Internet]. United States; US9271822B2, 2016 [cited 2026 May 8]. Available from: https://patents.google.com/patent/US9271822B2/en
8. Wang W, Ao Q. Research and application progress on dural substitutes. J Neurorestoratology [Internet]. 2019 Dec [cited 2026 May 8];7(4):161–70. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26599/JNR.2019.9040020
9. Fauzi A Al, Fauza J, Suroto H, Parenrengi MA, Suryaningtyas W, Widiyanti P, et al. An In vitro study of chitosan-coated bovine pericardium as a dural substitute candidate. J Funct Biomater [Internet]. 2023 Sep 22 [cited 2026 May 8];14(10):488. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb14100488
10. Cho M, Shim KM, Park SS, Kang SS, Jang K, Kim SE. Evaluation of biocompatibility and healing properties of dural substitutes produced by electrospinning technology. In Vivo (Brooklyn) [Internet]. 2024 Apr 30 [cited 2026 Jun 30];38(3):1119–26. Available from: https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.13546
11. Cazón P, Velázquez G, Vázquez M. Bacterial cellulose films: Evaluation of the water interaction. Food Packag Shelf Life [Internet]. 2020 Sep [cited 2026 May 8];25:100526. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2020.100526
12. Paramadini AW, Widiyanti P, Rudyardjo DI. Effects of Collagen concentration variation toward characteristics of bacterial cellulose-collagen biocomposites as candidate of artificial dura mater. J Biom Biomater Biomed Eng [Internet]. 2017 Jul [cited 2026 May 8];33:80–7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/JBBBE.33.80
13. Lu KY, Lin YC, Lu HT, Ho YC, Weng SC, Tsai ML, et al. A novel injectable in situ forming gel based on carboxymethyl hexanoyl chitosan/hyaluronic acid polymer blending for sustained release of berberine. Carbohydr Polym [Internet]. 2019 Feb [cited 2026 May 8];206:664–73. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.11.050
14. Thongchai K, Chuysinuan P, Thanyacharoen T, Techasakul S, Ummartyotin S. Integration of collagen into chitosan blend film composites: physicochemical property aspects for pharmaceutical materials. SN Appl Sci [Internet]. 2020 Feb 22 [cited 2026 May 8];2(2):255. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2052-5
15. Angtika RS, Widiyanti P, Aminatun A. Bacterial cellulose-chitosan-glycerol biocomposite as artificial dura mater candidates for head trauma. J Biom Biomater Biomed Eng [Internet]. 2018 Mar 30 [cited 2026 May 8];36:7–16. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/JBBBE.36.7
16. Widiyanti P, Alifiany AW, Supardi A. Bacterial cellulose composite-collagen-glycerol as an innovation of artificial dura mater candidates for open head trauma case. In [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2026 Jun 30]. p. 050011. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0193674
17. Rumon MdMH. Advances in cellulose-based hydrogels: tunable swelling dynamics and their versatile real-time applications. RSC Adv [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2026 Jun 30];15(15):11688–729. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1039/d5ra00521c
18. Irham WH, Tamrin, Marpaung L, Marpongahtun. Characterization of bacterial cellulose from coconut water supplemented Curcuma Longa Linn and Ziziphus Mauritiana extract. In [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2026 Jun 30]. p. 020056. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0023953
19. Saska S, Teixeira LN, Tambasco de Oliveira P, Minarelli Gaspar AM, Lima Ribeiro SJ, Messaddeq Y, et al. Bacterial cellulose-collagen nanocomposite for bone tissue engineering. J Mater Chem [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2026 May 8];22(41):22102. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1039/c2jm33762b
20. Atykyan N, Revin V, Shutova V. Raman and FT-IR Spectroscopy investigation the cellulose structural differences from bacteria Gluconacetobacter sucrofermentans during the different regimes of cultivation on a molasses media. AMB Express [Internet]. 2020 Dec 3 [cited 2026 May 8];10(1):84. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-020-01020-8
21. Long Y, Zhao X, Liu S, Chen M, Liu B, Ge J, et al. Collagen–hydroxypropyl methylcellulose membranes for corneal regeneration. ACS Omega [Internet]. 2018 Jan 31 [cited 2026 May 8];3(1):1269–75. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.7b01511
22. Lohrasbi S, Mirzaei E, Karimizade A, Takallu S, Rezaei A. Collagen/cellulose nanofiber hydrogel scaffold: physical, mechanical and cell biocompatibility properties. Cellulose [Internet]. 2020 Jan 6 [cited 2026 May 8];27(2):927–40. Available from: htpps://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02841-y
23. Egamberdiev EA, Ergashev YT, Khaydullaev KK, Akmalova GY, Rakhmonberdiev GR. The Effect of chitosan on the surface properties of cellulose-based paper obtained from the stem of falxseed. Tech Scie Innovation [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2026 May 8];2022(1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.51346/tstu-01.22.1-77-0156
24. Cheng X, Zhang Z, Ren H, Zou Z, Zhang Y, Qu Y, et al. A Low-swelling hydrogel as a multirole sealant for efficient dural defect sealing and prevention of postoperative adhesion. Natl Sci Rev [Internet]. 2024 May 3 [cited 2026 Jun 30];11(6). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwae160
25. Tseng WL, Xiao F. Duraseal thecal sac compression after lumbar discectomy causing radiculopathy. Spine J [Internet]. 2015 Aug [cited 2026 Jun 30];15(8):1892–3. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2015.03.048
26. Ma Z, Bao G, Li J. Multifaceted Design and Emerging Applications of tissue adhesives. Adv Mater [Internet]. 2021 Jun 6 [cited 2026 Jun 30];33(24). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202007663
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Adanti Wido Paramadini, Ajeng Dyah Kurniawati, Faizah, Rheynaldi Wijaya, Muhammad Saldi Dermawan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
